Structure and stability
The prosecution must describe the hierarchy, division of roles and permanence of the group. Lists of names with sporadic contacts do not characterize an organization.
Economic crime · Law 12,850/2013
The criminal organization charge is often used to extend deadlines, justify detentions and legitimize special evidence methods. Checking whether the legal requirements are present is the first step of the defense.
Law 12,850/2013 requires the association of four or more persons, structurally ordered and with division of tasks, even if informal, aiming to obtain an advantage of any kind through offenses with a maximum sentence above four years or of a transnational nature. Without stability, structure or the minimum number of members, the case may be one of criminal association (article 288 of the Penal Code) or mere joint participation, with very different consequences.
This page is for individuals and companies affected by police operations, indictments or investigations mentioning criminal organization, including in business, public procurement and financial contexts. Practice throughout the State of São Paulo, Brazil, including inland and coastal districts, with in-person meetings in São Paulo (Paulista and Tatuapé offices) or by video call.
The prosecution must describe the hierarchy, division of roles and permanence of the group. Lists of names with sporadic contacts do not characterize an organization.
Each defendant must have their participation described. Generic indictments attributing everything to everyone are defective and may be rejected.
Cooperating witnesses need corroboration by independent evidence. The defense checks the ratification, voluntariness and consistency of the account.
Special evidence methods require a reasoned judicial authorization, deadlines and reports. Formal defects taint derived evidence.
The seriousness of the charge does not authorize automatic detention. The defense shows the absence of concrete risk and proposes alternative measures.
Freezing, seizure and extended forfeiture reach assets and companies. The separation between lawful assets and the alleged proceeds is worked through documents.
Confidential investigations limit access, but elements already documented must be made available to the defense. The request is filed immediately.
In business cases, guiding directors and employees on preserving documents and on what not to do prevents new charges.
Cooperation and agreements should only be considered with the body of evidence known. Hasty decisions are irreversible.
Reading decisions, warrants and reports to identify what exists against each person.
Challenging evidence obtained without legal basis and requesting favorable expert examinations and measures.
Response to the charge, requests for release and asset release, hearings and appeals.
Do not delete messages or discard devices after an operation. Besides being read as obstruction, deleted content can be recovered and used without the context that would explain it.
Three to eight years of imprisonment plus a fine, without prejudice to the sentences for the offenses committed by the group. Increases apply for use of weapons, participation of public officials and involvement of minors.
No. The law prohibits decisions based solely on the word of a cooperating witness. Independent corroborating evidence is required.
A legal entity is not liable for this offense, but its officers may be, and the company may suffer freezes and administrative sanctions in parallel.
Reference legislation in Brazil. Characterization depends on the factual description in the indictment and the evidence produced.
Describe what happened through the secure channel. The screening identifies the position of each person involved, the measures in force and the urgent steps.